As a reminder, here is the list of the top 10 most cited neuroscience papers from the last ten years:
1. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis.
2. Epigenetic programming by maternal behavior.
3. Expanded GGGGCC Hexanucleotide Repeat in Noncoding Region of C9ORF72 Causes Chromosome 9p-Linked FTD and ALS.
4. Epigenetic regulation of the glucocorticoid receptor in human brain associates with childhood abuse.
5. Suppression of basal autophagy in neural cells causes neurodegenerative disease in mice.
6. Mutations in FUS, an RNA processing protein, cause familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis type 6.
7. Microglia: active sensor and versatile effector cells in the normal and pathologic brain.
8. Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards.
9. The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game.
10. TDP-43 mutations in familial and sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
You can also go back to my previous post and see the longer (and more detailed) list of most-cited papers from the last ten years.
I made some word clouds! I took my database and removed words like “neuroscience”, “neuron”, “cells”, etc. Here are the most common words from the top 100 most cited papers of the last ten years:
I don’t trust the data to go down any further. The lesson here is if you want an incredibly well-cited paper, work on human cognition! If you just want a really well-cited one, you can work on mechanisms, circuitry, or stem cells. And unless you are working on the hippocampus, definitely don’t refer to what region of the brain you are studying unless you just want a pretty well-cited paper.
So much for making explicit that you work on rats and mice; people only want to know if you are working on humans or AIs!